In Philip Yancey’s book What’s So Amazing About Grace? the author writes of the personal grace that should resound in the lives of Christians. Over and over again, Yancey demonstrates that grace is the only option when one recognizes that we all suffer from the same condition – sinners, who apart from Christ have no recourse for heaven.
Later in the book, Yancey turns from the personal to the global. And when I write global, I mean quite literally. The author contends that many of today’s international issues have become politically associated with the “religious right”. And that in fighting for the political positions that concern them, many have seasoned the debates not with the personal grace that they’ve experienced, but with the ungrace of differences.
This discussion did not resound with me until I was listening to a sermon by a dear family friend, Ronnie Stevens. In his sermon on John 12:30-41, Pastor Ronnie reminded me that in Christ’s day, many of His contemporaries were expecting a political leader. One of the reasons that many struggled to believe that Jesus could be the Messiah was because He did not establish a political kingdom. The expectation was that God’s Chosen One would establish an unconquerable reign on Earth and Jesus, while He lived here, did not fulfill these worldly expectations.
Today many Christians once again try to make Jesus a political leader. Now, please recognize that as I write this brief treatise there are many things that can not be fully explicated. Many issues that Christians rally against have moral consequences and are misaligned with the Christian faith. But many political issues do not. And by engaging on these debates and attempting to align them with Christian precepts, we do a disservice to both our faith and its Founder. Separately, many issues are not political and yet Christians should be on the front-line of service. Before it was the Hollywood vogue to visit Africa, scores of Christian missionaries were taking care of the sick and dying there. Not yet on the political radar screen, they did it because that’s what their Savior called them to.
During His time Christ resisted all attempts to become a political leader. In our time, let us not try to foist upon Him the same earthly aspirations.
UPDATE – After posting the above, I read the following from Henri Nouwen’s In the Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership. It summarizes nicely what I’ve tried to convey:
Words like ‘right-wing’, ‘reactionary’, ‘conservative,’ ‘liberal,’ and ‘left-wing’ are used to describe people’s opinions, and many discussions then seem more like political battles for power than spiritual searches for truth . . . Dealing with burning issues without being rooted in a deep personal relationship with God easily leads to divisiveness because, before we know it , our sense of self is caught up in our opinion of a subject. But when we are securely rooted in personal intimacy with the source of life, it will be possible to remain flexible without being relativistic, convinced without being rigid, willing to confront without being offensive, gentle and forgiving without being soft, and true witnesses without being manipulative (44, 45-47).